[SR-Users] topoh quirk with 200 OK for CANCEL

Daniel-Constantin Mierla miconda at gmail.com
Wed Jan 20 17:19:21 CET 2016

On 20/01/16 17:04, Alex Balashov wrote:
> On 01/20/2016 11:01 AM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
>> But you reminded me that I should highlight again that private replies
>> to mailing discussions are unlikely to be followed, going in the common
>> folder (no longer filtered by mailing list rules), where I have a lot of
>> unsolicited emails and I don't check it often -- searching now the
>> [sr-users] prefix on subject shows couple of hundreds there, so if
>> anyone replied directly to me to a mailing list discussion without being
>> advised to do so and wants an answer, better resend to mailing list.
> Yeah, I know. And I agree with you one hundred percent on the reasons
> for why threads should be kept public consistently.
> Sometimes there are packet captures with customer proprietary network
> information or other topology information, however, and replacing with
> fake values is not always easy. In some situations, the original
> values can be integral to the problem. In those cases and in those
> cases only, I may send something privately.
> If you insist, I can post the CANCEL-200 OK exchange with proprietary
> topology redacted.
No need to send on mailing list, traces/sensitive data can be sent
directly - if there is a note on mailing list it was send, I will grab
it for anyone, this is something common done so far.


Daniel-Constantin Mierla
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Book: SIP Routing With Kamailio - http://www.asipto.com

More information about the sr-users mailing list