[SR-Users] [sr-dev] VERY IMPORTANT: deciding when to remove the MI code
miconda at gmail.com
Fri Dec 2 09:04:29 CET 2016
On 02/12/2016 00:24, Juha Heinanen wrote:
> Brandon Armstead writes:
>> +1 - I'm all for cleaning up any technical debt and moving on with more
>> normalized concept.
> I'm also in favor of getting rid on MI interface. I'm myself relying
> only on one MI command (pua_publish) for which an RPC command does not
> exist (or did not exist last time when I checked).
> Some years ago I tried to implement RPC version of pua_publish, but was
> not able to get the call back working correctly. I also sent some
> messages including a piece of code to the dev list, but it was a dead
> end then.
> Very nice if pua.publish would see a day of light again.
Can you find that discussion in the archive? Open an item on bug tracker
and add the link to the discussion there, so we don't forget about it.
www.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio World Conference - May 8-10, 2017 - www.kamailioworld.com
More information about the sr-users