[SR-Users] Path & Loose Route

[Colin Morelli]

Luke,

This is actually the behavior I would expect, though admittedly I've never
tried to rely on received= parameter routing for requests (I wasn't aware
that was something that should be supported).

However, you're probably better of addressing your NAT issues in a
different part of your request lifecycle. Could you share a bit more about
the setup you're using here? Is this Freeswitch dialing out to a registered
endpoint? Where are registrations being handled? How is FS creating the
route headers?

If you just start with a layout if your infrastructure it'll probably
answer all those questions and we can come up with a solution from there.

Best,
Colin

On Mon, Aug 1, 2016 at 11:57 AM Luke Milbourne <luke.milbourne at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hi All,
>
> I've been going through my script against other examples on the internet
> and cannot see any differences, also changing use_received between 1 and 0
> makes no different.
>
> Kamailio still uses the Contact header instead of the Route header.
>
> If any one has any suggestions it would be very much appreciated, but I'll
> continue going through the config line by line.
>
> Kind regards,
> Luke
>
> On 1 August 2016 at 13:46, Luke Milbourne <luke.milbourne at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Is it correct to use loose_route() along side the path module?
>>
>> On 1 August 2016 at 13:33, Luke Milbourne <luke.milbourne at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Daniel,
>>>
>>> Yep, I've got the below in my kamailio.cfg
>>>
>>> modparam("path", "use_received", 1)
>>>
>>> Kind regards,
>>> Luke
>>>
>>> On 1 August 2016 at 13:25, Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda at gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hello,
>>>>
>>>> On 01/08/16 14:14, Luke Milbourne wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> Currently trying to use Kamailio as a passthrough to some FreeSWITCH
>>>> boxes.
>>>>
>>>> When receiving an invite from FreeSWITCH which contains a Route header
>>>> including received information, example below;
>>>>
>>>> Route: <sip:201 at 10.10.2.5:5072>;lr;received=sip:[PUBLIC_IP]:45126
>>>>
>>>> When using loose_route() Kamailio still send the invite to the rfc1918
>>>> address instead of the received IP:PORT in the Route header.
>>>>
>>>> Am I misunderstanding how this should work?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> if you use path module, have you enabled the option to use the received
>>>> parameter?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> https://www.kamailio.org/docs/modules/stable/modules/path.html#idp38033932
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Daniel
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Daniel-Constantin Mierlahttp://www.asipto.com - http://www.kamailio.orghttp://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
>>>> sr-users at lists.sip-router.org
>>>> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Luke Milbourne
>>> <luke.milbourne at gmail.com>
>>>
>>> Tel: 07857154817
>>> Google Talk/Email: luke.milbourne at gmail.com
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Luke Milbourne
>> <luke.milbourne at gmail.com>
>>
>> Tel: 07857154817
>> Google Talk/Email: luke.milbourne at gmail.com
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Luke Milbourne
> <luke.milbourne at gmail.com>
>
> Tel: 07857154817
> Google Talk/Email: luke.milbourne at gmail.com
> _______________________________________________
> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
> sr-users at lists.sip-router.org
> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20160801/41779fc8/attachment.html>