[SR-Users] Path & Loose Route

[Luke Milbourne]

Is it correct to use loose_route() along side the path module?

On 1 August 2016 at 13:33, Luke Milbourne <luke.milbourne at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Daniel,
>
> Yep, I've got the below in my kamailio.cfg
>
> modparam("path", "use_received", 1)
>
> Kind regards,
> Luke
>
> On 1 August 2016 at 13:25, Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> On 01/08/16 14:14, Luke Milbourne wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Currently trying to use Kamailio as a passthrough to some FreeSWITCH
>> boxes.
>>
>> When receiving an invite from FreeSWITCH which contains a Route header
>> including received information, example below;
>>
>> Route: <sip:201 at 10.10.2.5:5072>;lr;received=sip:[PUBLIC_IP]:45126
>>
>> When using loose_route() Kamailio still send the invite to the rfc1918
>> address instead of the received IP:PORT in the Route header.
>>
>> Am I misunderstanding how this should work?
>>
>>
>> if you use path module, have you enabled the option to use the received
>> parameter?
>>
>> https://www.kamailio.org/docs/modules/stable/modules/path.html#idp38033932
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Daniel
>>
>> --
>> Daniel-Constantin Mierlahttp://www.asipto.com - http://www.kamailio.orghttp://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
>> sr-users at lists.sip-router.org
>> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Luke Milbourne
> <luke.milbourne at gmail.com>
>
> Tel: 07857154817
> Google Talk/Email: luke.milbourne at gmail.com
>



-- 
Luke Milbourne
<luke.milbourne at gmail.com>

Tel: 07857154817
Google Talk/Email: luke.milbourne at gmail.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20160801/10033b70/attachment.html>