[SR-Users] Using flags in t_branch_timeout() section of failure_route{}

[Marrold]

Hi Alex,

Thanks for the response, I will try using an avp instead.

I interpreted  "message flags (or transaction flags) will works as they do
now, but the branch mask will be removed (rolling back as in 0.9.x
versions). These flags are transaction persistent." from
https://www.kamailio.org/dokuwiki/doku.php/utils:flags to mean the flags
were per transaction, however that Wiki page is a little old.

Is there some more updated documentation regarding flags I should read?

On Sun, Apr 24, 2016 at 4:20 PM, Alex Balashov <abalashov at evaristesys.com>
wrote:

> ‎Hi,
>
> ‎Flags of this sort are unfortunately per-message; you'd want something
> transaction-persistent, like $avps.‎
>
> --
> Alex Balashov | Principal | Evariste Systems LLC
> 1447 Peachtree Street NE, Suite 700
> Atlanta, GA 30309
> United States
>
> Tel: +1-800-250-5920 (toll-free) / +1-678-954-0671 (direct)
> Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/, http://www.csrpswitch.com/
>
> Sent from my BlackBerry.
>   Original Message
> From: Marrold
> Sent: Sunday, April 24, 2016 10:34
> To: Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
> Reply To: Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
> Subject: [SR-Users] Using flags in t_branch_timeout() section of
> failure_route{}
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
> sr-users at lists.sip-router.org
> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20160424/afffca85/attachment.html>