[SR-Users] dmq_usrloc for writing to DB on one machine

[Daniel-Constantin Mierla]

Hello,

iirc, if one node doesn't handle a SIP register itself, should not
publish to other nodes anything. Is this what you are looking for -- one
node not to send to the others?

Cheers,
Daniel

On 20/10/15 17:24, Sebastian Damm wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I evaluated the dmq_usrloc module, and it works pretty good if there
> are two identical machines which replicate their location with each
> other. But what I actually want to do is to send registrations to an
> extra machine which is just there for writing the location into a
> central DB (in one table for all the registrars), from where it can be
> accessed (by a web page for example).
>
> So for example, I have three machines, registrar 1 and registrar 2,
> and receiver. receiver will never interact with customers. It is just
> there for writing the location into the database.
>
> I configured both registrars to send their packets to receiver, and I
> configured the receiver to send its packets (which it actually never
> does) to a dns name containing both registrars. But after reading the
> content of some PING messages and reading something about
> "autodiscovery" of dmq on the mailing list, I'm not sure whether my
> scenario will work the way I want it to.
>
> Can somebody explain whether I can use dmq_usrloc for this purpose? Or
> is it only intended to be used for bidirectional replication?
>
> Best Regards,
> Sebastian
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
> sr-users at lists.sip-router.org
> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users

-- 
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Book: SIP Routing With Kamailio - http://www.asipto.com

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20151020/17e08686/attachment.html>