[SR-Users] Can following scenario be implemented using Kamilio

[Jayanth Acharya]

Thanks Alex.Wow, that was very fast.
I am new to Kamilio (and SIP in general), but a quick research tells that
I've to configure Kamilio to run in the transaction stateful mode, which in
turn brings down it's performance. Is that correct ?

On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 10:29 PM, Alex Balashov <abalashov at evaristesys.com>
wrote:

> On 03/03/2015 11:56 AM, Jayanth Acharya wrote:
>
>  Would like to know if Kamilio (in it's sip-proxy role) could be
>> configured to somehow take note of the 'Contact:' header of a 302
>> response from B-party, to forward the INVITE to C-party (specified by
>> the updated Contact URI) ?
>>
>
> Absolutely. You can catch the 302 redirect in a failure_route, parse it
> out, set it to be the new Request URI, and t_relay() it back out (thus
> creating another branch).
>
> -- Alex
>
> --
> Alex Balashov - Principal
> Evariste Systems LLC
> 235 E Ponce de Leon Ave
> Suite 106
> Decatur, GA 30030
> United States
>
> Tel: +1-678-954-0670
> Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/, http://www.alexbalashov.com/
>
> _______________________________________________
> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
> sr-users at lists.sip-router.org
> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20150303/619be425/attachment.html>