[SR-Users] Keeping Registrations alive in IPv6 scenarios
Olle E. Johansson
oej at edvina.net
Fri Feb 27 09:33:32 CET 2015
On 27 Feb 2015, at 09:04, Sebastian Damm <damm at sipgate.de> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> while testing IPv6 with customers, we fell over quite a few cases, where customers aren't reachable on inbound calls most of the time. And digging into this, we found the home router firewall as the cause for those problems.
>
> Normally, you would think, all the NAT problems cease when switching to IPv6. But actually, right now I don't know how to fix that problem.
>
> In IPv4 NAT scenarios, we would flag the customer during the registration, and Kamailio would send NAT pings (those 4 bytes of UDP junk) every few seconds to keep the firewall in the NAT router open. And that worked pretty great.
>
> Now we have IPv6. We don't have NAT. But we still have a home router in front of SIP devices, with a firewall. And this firewall will allow outbound traffic. But after a few seconds it won't allow incoming connections anymore. And the routers I have seen so far don't have a configurable firewall where you could allow inbound traffic from our server.
>
> Unfortunately, only our load balancer is IPv6, our registrar is still IPv4 only. And the loadbalancer doesn't know anything about registrations and which customer needs an IPv6 keepalive.
>
> Does anyone have a hint, how to keep the IPv6 registrations alive? Thanks in advance.
>
AARGH. Now I see. Thank you. (Disregard earlier e-mail).
In all modern standards, like SIP Outbound, the need to send keep-alives has been pushed to the client. They need to open a network flow and keep it open - UDP or TCP or TCP/TLS.
As we can't trust device developers to stay up to date, we may need IPv6 keepalives.
/O
More information about the sr-users
mailing list