[SR-Users] Kamailio with NATted RTPproxy

[Jean-Marie Baran]

On 18/08/2015 15:44, Fred Posner wrote:
> On 08/18/2015 09:39 AM, Jean-Marie Baran wrote:
>> Should I understand that the router should send the packet back to
>> Kamailio which then send them to the SIP server ?
> RTP packets will flow from client to client or with rtpproxy, from
> client <-> rtpproxy <-> client.

Err, I meant RTPproxy, not Kamailio, but yes. In the SDP, is it maybe 
smarter to put the Kamailio (RTPproxy) private IP address in the c= 
field, so that the client contact directly RTPproxy without passing 
through the router first (which does not make much sense to me).

I hate NATs :'(

-- 
*Jean-Marie Baran*
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20150818/c288a013/attachment.html>