[SR-Users] apache 2.4 wstunnel

[Alex Balashov]

On 04/08/2015 03:32 PM, Muhammad Shahzad wrote:

> In my opinion, Nginx has a better solution then apache for WS proxy. It
> allows to define "extra" headers that the proxy service is suppose to
> forward to backend server, so that back-end server have full
> understanding of client characteristics (including the connection type
> being WS instead of HTTP).

+1 for Nginx as a ws-proxy. We use it inside our product for bulk data 
transfers streamed over WebSockets and it works very well.

-- 
Alex Balashov | Principal | Evariste Systems LLC
303 Perimeter Center North, Suite 300
Atlanta, GA 30346
United States

Tel: +1-800-250-5920 (toll-free) / +1-678-954-0671 (direct)
Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/, http://www.csrpswitch.com/