[SR-Users] Routing calls to a subscribed softphone
Paul Smith
paul.smith at claritytele.com
Fri Oct 3 09:31:37 CEST 2014
Great stuff.
NAT is a whole other basket of pain. Again the example configs in the
kamailio distribution are a good place to start... in particular the
NATDETECT and NATMANAGE routines, and the nathelper and rtpproxy module
usage.
good luck
> Hi Paul
>
> Just wanted to give you an update.
>
> This looks like it has worked. Now I am dealing with my own natting
> issues on my home network to get the call but the invites are being
> sent right now.
>
> Thanks again for the assistance.
>
> All the best.
>
> Will Ferrer
>
> On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 11:53 PM, Paul Smith
> <paul.smith at claritytele.com <mailto:paul.smith at claritytele.com>> wrote:
>
> Hi Will,
> It sounds like your kamailio.cfg is not looking up the user
> location database before trying to relay the INVITE. There is a
> relevant section in the kamailio-basic.cfg example configuration file:
>
>
> request_route {
> ...
>
> # user location service
> route(LOCATION);
> }
>
> ...
>
> # USER location service
> route[LOCATION] {
> if (!lookup("location")) {
> $var(rc) = $rc;
> t_newtran();
> switch ($var(rc)) {
> case -1:
> case -3:
> send_reply("404", "Not Found");
> exit;
> case -2:
> send_reply("405", "Method Not Allowed");
> exit;
> }
> }
>
> # when routing via usrloc, log the missed calls also
> if (is_method("INVITE")) {
> setflag(FLT_ACCMISSED);
> }
>
> route(RELAY);
> exit;
> }
>
>
> The logic is that if the call is for a local registered user whose
> location is available in the "kamctl ul" then request_route()
> should pass the request to the route(LOCATION) routine. The
> function call lookup("location") then does the magic if matching
> the address of record ([subscriber_name]@[our_domain_name]) and
> returning the $ruri of the registered phone ([realid]@[realip]).
> route(RELAY) is then able to send the call on to the phone's
> actual IP address.
>
> Hope that helps.
>
> Paul Smith
>
> On 02/10/14 03:33, Will Ferrer wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> I was wondering if any one had any advice or examples for me of
>> how to get a call to be routed to a subscribed softphone.
>>
>> We have 2 boxes in our testing deployment, a load balancer / sbc
>> and a call processing box.
>>
>> Calls come in to the sbc, and then are passed to the call
>> processing box. The call is analyzed and the branch uri is
>> rewritten to a destination address when applicable for the call
>> (this is how we handle routing of calls to certain numbers -- we
>> do this utilizing custom code and a custom db).
>>
>> This works just fine when the destination sip uri is phone number
>> (in which case we do lcr) or if the destination goes to a remote
>> address.
>>
>> However when the destination is a subscriber:
>> sip:[subscriber_name]@[our_domain_name], the call is passed back
>> to the sbc, which passes it to the callprocessing box, back and
>> forth until a too many hops error occurs.
>>
>> The subscriber I am trying to send the call too does show up
>> under "kamctl ul show".
>>
>> I feel like there is something basic I must be missing here.
>>
>> Does any one have any advice for me?
>>
>> Thank you very much in advance.
>>
>> All the best.
>>
>> Will Ferrer
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
>> sr-users at lists.sip-router.org <mailto:sr-users at lists.sip-router.org>
>> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing
> list
> sr-users at lists.sip-router.org <mailto:sr-users at lists.sip-router.org>
> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20141003/a0dad657/attachment.html>
More information about the sr-users
mailing list