[SR-Users] Rtpengine vs. TURN?

Peter Villeneuve petervnv1 at gmail.com
Sat Jul 12 19:55:02 CEST 2014


Hi,

On my server, I have the option of using either Rtpengine for NAT traversal
or pure TURN without rtpengine.
Rtpengine has the obvious plus that it only needs 1 public IP, while TURN
(with STUN) will need 2 public IPs, although that's not a problem in my
case.

Having said that, I'd like to take advantage of the huge experience that
users of this list have in real world deployments. in your experience,
which option is more reliable in a real world deployment?

Cheers,
Peter
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20140712/c2639f87/attachment.html>


More information about the sr-users mailing list