[SR-Users] Replacing an ACME Packet Net-Net SBC

[Francesco Maria Magnini]

Fred,

in you ACME replacement, kamailio doesn’t rewrite headers for handling RTP/SIGNALING and stay in the middle?

Il giorno 21/feb/2014, alle ore 00:03, Fred Posner <fred at palner.com> ha scritto:

> On 2/20/14, 5:55 PM, Francesco Maria Magnini wrote:
>> @Carsten
>> I looked at http://www.iptel.org/sems and seems to be only broken links to downloads.
>> Do you know if the project is still maintained?
>> 
>> @Fred
>> Are you using openser as a B2BUA?
> 
> No, because of course Kamailio is not a b2bua. =)
> 
> In the case of the ACME replacement, we used it to:
> 
> - handle NAT (rtpproxy)
> - user regs
> - load balance
> - lcr
> - security
> - routing
> 
> and some other little hacks.
> 
> -- 
> Fred Posner | The Palner Group, Inc.
> http://qxork.com
> 
>> 
>> Il giorno 20/feb/2014, alle ore 19:42, Fred Posner <fred at palner.com> ha scritto:
>> 
>>> Alex's article is one of my favorites. That being said, we switched out an Acme SBC for openser (at the time) and was immediately thrilled.
>>> 
>>> Fred Posner
>>> The Palner Group, Inc.
>>> 503-914-0999 (direct)
>>> 954-472-2896 (fax)
>>> 
>>> On 02/20/2014 01:14 PM, Alex Balashov wrote:
>>>> Francesco,
>>>> 
>>>> Have a look at this blog post:
>>>> 
>>>> http://www.likewise.am/2013/03/kamailio-as-an-sbc-session-border-controller/
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> That said, I agree with Carsten's suggestion of SEMS.
>>>> 
>>>> On 02/20/2014 11:04 AM, Francesco Maria Magnini wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>> 
>>>>> I would like to have some suggestions about a full replacement of an
>>>>> ACME Packet Net-Net Session Border Controller.
>>>>> By now, ACME SBC performs all the SBC functionalities, mainly:
>>>>> 
>>>>> - it is used as a SIP endpoint for SIP client registrations
>>>>> - it is used as a SIP endpoint for interconnection to multiple SIP
>>>>> carriers via SIP trunks
>>>>> - it is used for NAT traversal
>>>>> 
>>>>> In this deployment, the SIP Server communicates only with the SBC and
>>>>> this one takes care of the communication between the SIP Server and
>>>>> the external SIP entities (UA clients, SIP Trunks).
>>>>> In this scenario, can I consider to replace the SBC with Kamailio?
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
>>>>> sr-users at lists.sip-router.org
>>>>> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
>>> sr-users at lists.sip-router.org
>>> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
>> sr-users at lists.sip-router.org
>> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
> sr-users at lists.sip-router.org
> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20140221/ed53cc5e/attachment.html>