[SR-Users] Replacing an ACME Packet Net-Net SBC

[Fred Posner]

Alex's article is one of my favorites. That being said, we switched out 
an Acme SBC for openser (at the time) and was immediately thrilled.

Fred Posner
The Palner Group, Inc.
503-914-0999 (direct)
954-472-2896 (fax)

On 02/20/2014 01:14 PM, Alex Balashov wrote:
> Francesco,
>
> Have a look at this blog post:
>
> http://www.likewise.am/2013/03/kamailio-as-an-sbc-session-border-controller/
>
>
> That said, I agree with Carsten's suggestion of SEMS.
>
> On 02/20/2014 11:04 AM, Francesco Maria Magnini wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I would like to have some suggestions about a full replacement of an
>> ACME Packet Net-Net Session Border Controller.
>> By now, ACME SBC performs all the SBC functionalities, mainly:
>>
>> - it is used as a SIP endpoint for SIP client registrations
>> - it is used as a SIP endpoint for interconnection to multiple SIP
>> carriers via SIP trunks
>> - it is used for NAT traversal
>>
>> In this deployment, the SIP Server communicates only with the SBC and
>> this one takes care of the communication between the SIP Server and
>> the external SIP entities (UA clients, SIP Trunks).
>> In this scenario, can I consider to replace the SBC with Kamailio?
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
>> sr-users at lists.sip-router.org
>> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>>
>
>