[SR-Users] Replacing an ACME Packet Net-Net SBC

Alex Balashov abalashov at evaristesys.com
Thu Feb 20 19:14:06 CET 2014


Francesco,

Have a look at this blog post:

http://www.likewise.am/2013/03/kamailio-as-an-sbc-session-border-controller/

That said, I agree with Carsten's suggestion of SEMS.

On 02/20/2014 11:04 AM, Francesco Maria Magnini wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I would like to have some suggestions about a full replacement of an ACME Packet Net-Net Session Border Controller.
> By now, ACME SBC performs all the SBC functionalities, mainly:
>
> - it is used as a SIP endpoint for SIP client registrations
> - it is used as a SIP endpoint for interconnection to multiple SIP carriers via SIP trunks
> - it is used for NAT traversal
>
> In this deployment, the SIP Server communicates only with the SBC and this one takes care of the communication between the SIP Server and the external SIP entities (UA clients, SIP Trunks).
> In this scenario, can I consider to replace the SBC with Kamailio?
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
> sr-users at lists.sip-router.org
> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>


-- 
Alex Balashov - Principal
Evariste Systems LLC
235 E Ponce de Leon Ave
Suite 106
Decatur, GA 30030
United States
Tel: +1-678-954-0670
Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/, http://www.alexbalashov.com/



More information about the sr-users mailing list