[SR-Users] Send socket and sequential requests

[Alex Balashov]

You know what? I do have double RR disabled. I thought about that, and was so sure I wouldn't have turned it off that I didn't even check. But it's disabled. I feel quite stupid. Let me retest and let you know what happens. 


On 14 August 2014 07:13:36 GMT-04:00, Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>On 14/08/14 12:47, Alex Balashov wrote:
>> On 08/14/2014 06:41 AM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
>>>
>>> On 14/08/14 12:14, Alex Balashov wrote:
>>>> On 08/13/2014 11:28 AM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> On 13/08/14 17:21, Alex Balashov wrote:
>>>>>> On 08/13/2014 11:03 AM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Btw, is any of these sockets bound to a virtual network
>interface?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yes; it's eth0 and eth0:1. Is that a factor?
>>>>>>
>>>>> Could be. Is record_route() adding two headers?
>>>>
>>>> No, it is not.
>>> Can you send the ngrep to see how it appears on the network?
>>
>> Sure thing. I sent it to you privately to avoid masking IP addresses.
>>
>Just double checking -- you haven't disable the double rr via module,
>isn't?
>
>Do you have explicit listen= or it is left to listen on all interfaces?
>
>Can you give the output of:
>
>kamcmd corex.list_sockets ?
>
>Daniel

--
Sent from my mobile, and thus lacking in the refinement one might expect from a fully fledged keyboard. 

Alex Balashov - Principal 
Evariste Systems LLC
235 E Ponce de Leon Ave
Suite 106
Decatur, GA 30030
United States
Tel: +1-678-954-0671
Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/, http://www.alexbalashov.com