[SR-Users] Send socket and sequential requests

Daniel-Constantin Mierla miconda at gmail.com
Thu Aug 14 13:13:36 CEST 2014


On 14/08/14 12:47, Alex Balashov wrote:
> On 08/14/2014 06:41 AM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
>>
>> On 14/08/14 12:14, Alex Balashov wrote:
>>> On 08/13/2014 11:28 AM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 13/08/14 17:21, Alex Balashov wrote:
>>>>> On 08/13/2014 11:03 AM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Btw, is any of these sockets bound to a virtual network interface?
>>>>>
>>>>> Yes; it's eth0 and eth0:1. Is that a factor?
>>>>>
>>>> Could be. Is record_route() adding two headers?
>>>
>>> No, it is not.
>> Can you send the ngrep to see how it appears on the network?
>
> Sure thing. I sent it to you privately to avoid masking IP addresses.
>
Just double checking -- you haven't disable the double rr via module, isn't?

Do you have explicit listen= or it is left to listen on all interfaces?

Can you give the output of:

kamcmd corex.list_sockets ?

Daniel

-- 
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Next Kamailio Advanced Trainings 2014 - http://www.asipto.com
Sep 22-25, Berlin, Germany ::: Oct 15-17, San Francisco, USA




More information about the sr-users mailing list