[SR-Users] Trunk between Asterisk and Kamailio problem

[Francisco Casasempere]

I think I've caught!

I capture this packet sended by Asterisk.

#
U 2013/11/12 11:01:56.613522 XX.XX:XX.XX:5060 -> YY:YY:YY:YY:5060
OPTIONS sip:XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXt SIP/2.0.
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 172.16.1.2:5060;branch=z9hG4bK2ad587ba;rport.
Max-Forwards: 70.
From: "Unknown" <sip:Unknown at 172.16.1.2>;tag=as1fadd872.
To: <sip:XXXXXXXXXXXXt>.
Contact: <sip:Unknown at 172.16.1.2>.
Call-ID: 57182fc0100063057d51b3d6680e1767 at 172.16.1.2.
CSeq: 102 OPTIONS.
User-Agent: FPBX-2.9.0(1.6.2.13).
Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2013 10:01:52 GMT.
Allow: INVITE, ACK, CANCEL, OPTIONS, BYE, REFER, SUBSCRIBE, NOTIFY, INFO.
Supported: replaces, timer.
Content-Length: 0.

I think that Kamailio can't answer to this packet.

Maybe Asterisk have a bug?

I'm thinking about desactivate qualify in Asterisk.

What do you think?

Regards.




2013/11/11 Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda at gmail.com>

>  Hello,
>
> On 11/11/13 9:02 AM, Francisco Casasempere wrote:
>
> Hi list,
>
>  I have this structure
>
>  IP Phones -> Asterisk Client (LAN) -> (router) ->
> Kamailio/RTPproxy(Internet) -> Asterisk (local from Kamailio) -> Trunk
> SIP/Pstn
>
>  All is working well, I don't have problems with NAT and I managed about
> 6000 daily calls.
>
>  For a couple of months I've the next problem.The problem is that in the
> Asterisk randomly received this message.
>
>  [Sep 29 04:04:29] NOTICE[3393] chan_sip.c: Peer 'kamONOp' is now Lagged.
> (2075ms / 2000ms)
> [Sep 29 04:04:41] NOTICE[3393] chan_sip.c: Peer 'kamailioONO' is now
> Reachable. (1888ms / 2000ms)
>
>  In some Asterisk Client I get this message 10 times in a hour, and
> usually coincide with periods of high load on the kamailo.
>
> might be related to the response time to OPTIONS requests sent by
> Asterisk. Be sure you reply to them quickly in kamailio.cfg.
>
>
>  Also I am getting these messages in the log of Kamailio:
>
>  Nov 11 08:59:53 c1 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[8079]: INFO: <core>
> [forward.c:788]: broken reply to forward - no 2nd via
> Nov 11 08:59:53 c1 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[8082]: INFO: <core>
> [forward.c:788]: broken reply to forward - no 2nd via
>
>  Are these two issues related?
>
> This is info message, not an error at all. It means that the sip reply
> processed is very likely for a local request. I guess you have an older
> version of kamailio, the log message is different to suggest better the
> situation, as it is not a broken reply.
>
> Cheers,
> Daniel
>
>
>  Whay can I do?
>
>  Kind Regards
>
>
>  SiscoCS
>
>  (Sorry for my english)
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing listsr-users at lists.sip-router.orghttp://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>
>
> --
> Daniel-Constantin Mierla - http://www.asipto.comhttp://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
> Kamailio Advanced Trainings - Berlin, Nov 25-28
>   - more details about Kamailio trainings at http://www.asipto.com -
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
> sr-users at lists.sip-router.org
> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20131112/20ec839b/attachment.html>