[SR-Users] 1 via header

[Daniel-Constantin Mierla]

Hello,


On 11/8/13 10:05 AM, phillman25 wrote:
> Dear List
>
> I am trying to interconnect with a Cisco Call manager express, i am 
> sending the INVITE message with the below format:
>
> INVITE sip:22775019 at 81.21.39.153 <mailto:sip%3A22775019 at 81.21.39.153> 
> SIP/2.0
> Record-Route: <sip:81.21.38.33;lr=on;ftag=685329680;did=671.51a2>
> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 
> 81.21.38.33;branch=z9hG4bKda1d.291eab1622fb619ec7df3ca647581a19.0
> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 81.21.35.22:5060 <http://81.21.35.22:5060> 
> ;branch=z9hG4bKterm-4a32-99665015-6855A22775019-37284
> From: 99665015 <sip:99665015 at 81.21.35.22 
> <mailto:sip%3A99665015 at 81.21.35.22>;user=phone>;tag=685329680
> To: 6855A22775019 <sip:6855A22775019 at 81.21.38.33 
> <mailto:sip%3A6855A22775019 at 81.21.38.33>;user=phone>
> Call-ID: 6fea2437-2d338fcf-4efc6b90-2d08 at 81.21.35.22 
> <mailto:6fea2437-2d338fcf-4efc6b90-2d08 at 81.21.35.22>
> CSeq: 1 INVITE
> Supported: timer
> Session-Expires: 1800
> Min-SE: 1800
> Contact:  <sip:99665015 at 81.21.35.22:5060 
> <http://sip:99665015@81.21.35.22:5060>>
> Allow: INVITE,ACK,PRACK,SUBSCRIBE,BYE,CANCEL,NOTIFY,INFO,REFER,UPDATE
> Max-Forwards: 69
> Content-Type: application/sdp
> Content-Length: 528
> P-hint: outbound
>
> v=0
> o=- 3099173 0 IN IP4 81.21.35.44
> s=Cisco SDP 0
> c=IN IP4 81.21.35.44
> t=0 0
> m=audio 52168 RTP/AVP 0 8 18 99 102 103 104 4 105 3 106 107 108 125 
> 101 100
> a=rtpmap:99 G.726-16/8000
> a=rtpmap:102 G.726-24/8000
> a=rtpmap:103 G.726-32/8000
> a=rtpmap:104 G.723.1-H/8000
> a=rtpmap:105 G.723.1-L/8000
> a=rtpmap:106 G.729b/8000
> a=rtpmap:107 G.723.1a-H/8000
> a=rtpmap:108 G.723.1a-L/8000
> a=rtpmap:125 G.nX64/8000
> a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000
> a=fmtp:101 0-15
> a=rtpmap:100 X-NSE/8000
> a=fmtp:100 192-194
> a=nortpproxy:yes
>
>
>
>
>
> The Cisco Manager Express replies by sending the TRYING message in the 
> below format with 1 via header:
>
>
> SIP/2.0 100 Trying
> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 
> 81.21.38.33;branch=z9hG4bKda1d.291eab1622fb619ec7df3ca647581a19.0,SIP/2.0/UDP 
> 81.21.35.22:5060 <http://81.21.35.22:5060> 
> ;branch=z9hG4bKterm-4a32-99665015-6855A22775019-37284
> From: 99665015 <sip:99665015 at 81.21.35.22 
> <mailto:sip%3A99665015 at 81.21.35.22>;user=phone>;tag=685329680
> To: 6855A22775019 <sip:6855A22775019 at 81.21.38.33 
> <mailto:sip%3A6855A22775019 at 81.21.38.33>;user=phone>
> Date: Tue, 05 Nov 2013 18:24:17 GMT
> Call-ID: 6fea2437-2d338fcf-4efc6b90-2d08 at 81.21.35.22 
> <mailto:6fea2437-2d338fcf-4efc6b90-2d08 at 81.21.35.22>
> CSeq: 1 INVITE
> Allow-Events: telephone-event
> Server: Cisco-SIPGateway/IOS-12.x
> Content-Length: 0
>
>
>
> Seems like Kamailio is not accepting this, is the Trying message from 
> the client correct? Is it correct that he is sending 1 via header with 
> 2 IP's as opposed to 2 via headers with 1 IP in each via header? 
> Otherwise is there a solution for this?
>
it is ok to have two addresses in one Via header. Why do you think 
kamailio is not accepting it?

Cheers,
Daniel

-- 
Daniel-Constantin Mierla - http://www.asipto.com
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio Advanced Trainings - Berlin, Nov 25-28
   - more details about Kamailio trainings at http://www.asipto.com -

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20131108/5931451f/attachment.html>