[SR-Users] Mitigation of unavailable rtpproxy
tensai at zmonkey.org
Thu Nov 7 00:48:38 CET 2013
On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 12:03 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla
<miconda at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 11/6/13 2:58 PM, Alex Balashov wrote:
>> 2. Is there any harm in calling unforce_rtp_proxy() for Call-IDs rtpproxy
>> doesn't know about? is there a 'better' best practice for handling CANCELs
>> where it is unknown whether rtpproxy was engaged on the initial call
>> (because it is an option, nat_uac_detect, etc)?
> No, it is no harm to call rtpproxy for non-existing sessions. You can even
> skip it, there is a session timeout in rtpproxy -- I don't know default
> value, but probably can be set via command line parameter -- so if you are
> not short in ports, you can just leave rtpproxy alone with closed calls
> without calling unforce command.
I seem to recall that the default is to close the session after 60 seconds of
no RTP, but I'm not able to verify that right now.
More information about the sr-users