[SR-Users] event_route

[Bruno Bresciani]

Thank you for attention and help Daniel...

for while I will leave the rtpproxy destroy the session by itself in short
time it is not confirmed or by timeout if didn't received the delete of
session.
I think be better to start a new discussion thread about the new problem
too...

Best Regards


2013/5/16 Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda at gmail.com>

>  Hello,
>
>
> On 5/15/13 3:00 PM, Bruno Bresciani wrote:
>
> Hi Daniel,
>
>  Sure Daniel, I can process 487 on onreply route... I was trying to
> handle 487 in failure_route block, I didn't know it can be processed in
> onreply_route!
>
> failure route is executed when all branches fail, on reply route is
> executed for each reply received.
>
>
>
>  I know that rtpproxy destroys the session by itself in short time it is
> not confirmed, but I'm trying to force it the most amount of possible cases.
>
>  Now, my final problem (I hope) is destroy the rtp session when receive
> the BYE message to finish a forking call. I have to add “extra_id_pv” and
> use "b" parameter to get destroy the session on rtpproxy, but I don't know
> if exist somehow to discover if the BYE belongs a forking call context. I
> tryed use $branch variable but without success...
>
>
> I haven't worked with this extensions, maybe you get proper details from
> the appropriate developers. But might be better to start a new discussion
> thread with appropriate subject so it is spotted -- at least for me it is
> relevant to see proper subject, because if it is a discussions where I am
> not part which diverts to different topic where I could help, I don't read
> always.
>
> Cheers,
> Daniel
>
>
>
>  Best Regards
>
>
> 2013/5/15 Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda at gmail.com>
>
>>  Hello,
>>
>>
>> On 5/14/13 7:15 PM, Bruno Bresciani wrote:
>>
>> Thank's Daniel,
>>
>>  I need process cancel requests to delete sessions on rtp proxy... In a
>> call forking, when I need forking to multiple destinations on different
>> network segments, requiring different rtpproxy parameters, I use the
>> “extra_id_pv” and "b" parameter in the rtpproxy_offer() function to created
>> a session RTP to each branch of calling in rtp proxy. When one of branch
>> answer the call, I want delete the other(s) session(s) on rtp proxy
>> (unforce_rtp_proxy()) using the CANCEL SIP message to do this, but I can't
>> get handle it in configuration file...
>> I am wrong trying use the CANCEL message to delete session rtp? I will
>> try onsend_route to handle...
>>
>>
>>  maybe you can do it onreply route, when the invite is replied with 487.
>>
>> Anyhow, rtpproxy destroys the session by itself in short time it is not
>> confirmed.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Daniel
>>
>>
>>
>>  Best Regards
>>
>>
>> 2013/5/14 Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda at gmail.com>
>>
>>>  Hello,
>>>
>>> why do you need to process cancel requests? They have special routing
>>> requirements related to associated invite and sent from tm directly. The
>>> event route is for the requests sent by modules via tm.
>>>
>>> Haven't tried, but maybe onsend_route will capture it.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Daniel
>>>
>>>
>>> On 5/14/13 12:30 AM, Bruno Bresciani wrote:
>>>
>>>  Hi All,
>>>
>>>  in a call forking, after one branch answer the call (200 OK reply), a
>>> CANCEL SIP message has been sending to other/another branch(es) and I need
>>> to process this/these cancellations in configuration file. After reading
>>> some documentations, I discovered there is event_route[tm:local-request]
>>> block, which is executed when tm generates internally and sends a SIP
>>> request,  Such cases are:
>>>
>>>  SIP messages sent by msilo module
>>> SIP messages sent by presence server
>>> SIP messages sent by dialog module
>>> SIP messages sent via MI or CTL interfaces
>>>
>>>  I didn't understand very well this cases, so I insert event_route
>>> block in my kamailio.cfg but neither CANCEL SIP message or other requests
>>> generated by tm module was handled by event_route. I must be using wrong
>>> concept to handle this CANCEL SIP message, it's possible handle this
>>> messages in configuration file?
>>>
>>>  Best Regards
>>>
>>>
>>>  _______________________________________________
>>> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing listsr-users at lists.sip-router.orghttp://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Daniel-Constantin Mierla - http://www.asipto.comhttp://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
>>> Kamailio Advanced Training, San Francisco, USA - June 24-27, 2013
>>>   * http://asipto.com/u/katu *
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
>>> sr-users at lists.sip-router.org
>>> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>> Daniel-Constantin Mierla - http://www.asipto.comhttp://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
>> Kamailio Advanced Training, San Francisco, USA - June 24-27, 2013
>>   * http://asipto.com/u/katu *
>>
>>
>
> --
> Daniel-Constantin Mierla - http://www.asipto.comhttp://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
> Kamailio Advanced Training, San Francisco, USA - June 24-27, 2013
>   * http://asipto.com/u/katu *
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20130516/51a5d5ed/attachment.html>