[SR-Users] Not getting correct result after sending a OPTION query

arif aftnix at gmail.com
Thu Jun 20 16:11:42 CEST 2013



Hi,

I'm trying to understand intricacies of SIP protocol.

I'm installed a stock kamailio from git repo.

kamcmd> core.version
kamailio 4.0.2 (x86_64/linux) f87866

Now i'm trying to send OPTION request by "sipsak".

I've added two users :

arif at khost:~$ kamctl db show user
...........
+----+----------+---------------+------------+---------------+----------------------------------+----------------------------------+------+
| id | username | domain        | password   | email_address | ha1
                     | ha1b                             | rpid |
+----+----------+---------------+------------+---------------+----------------------------------+----------------------------------+------+
|  1 | test     | 192.168.7.143 | testpasswd |               |
ad87b307789553f95799738d87246ca0 | e211f539e22a1ad2cc0f3c07056c3517 |
NULL |
|  2 | test2    | localhost     | testpasswd |               |
46d8618f5b652e4aeff3ffe52f373028 | bb8564b436dcfa183a8228244d8527ea |
NULL |
+----+----------+---------------+------------+---------------+----------------------------------+----------------------------------+------+

Now The OPTION message i'm trying :

OPTIONS sip:test_local at localhost SIP/2.0
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 127.0.1.1:60518;branch=z9hG4bK.374c1583;rport;alias
From: sip:sipsak-jEV4NMQqubUqMp+WYRx65w at public.gmane.org:60518;tag=74766f41
To: sip:test_local at localhost
Call-ID: 1953918785-jEV4NMQqubUqMp+WYRx65w at public.gmane.org
CSeq: 1 OPTIONS
Contact: sip:sipsak-jEV4NMQqubUqMp+WYRx65w at public.gmane.org:60518
Content-Length: 0
Max-Forwards: 70
User-Agent: sipsak 0.9.6
Accept: text/plain

kamailio is respoding with :
SIP/2.0 404 Not Found

After digging in kamailio log :

2(17356) DEBUG: registrar [lookup.c:158]: lookup(): 'test_local' Not
found in usrloc --

The code reads :

155      ul.lock_udomain(_d, &aor);
156                 res = ul.get_urecord(_d, &aor, &r);
157                 if (res > 0) {
158                         LM_DBG("'%.*s' Not found in usrloc\n",
aor.len, ZSW(    aor.s));

So it seems i'm doing something very wrong.

Although in my config :

106 #!define WITH_MYSQL
107 #!define WITH_AUTH
108 #!define WITH_USERLOCDB

After going through the RFC3261's section 11.2,
It seems this OPTION message should work and generate a 200(OK).

What it is i'm doing wrong?




--
-Cheers
-Arif





More information about the sr-users mailing list