[SR-Users] Websockets WSS problem with NOTIFY
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
miconda at gmail.com
Thu Jan 24 10:50:09 CET 2013
Just fyi, tls compression is disabled by default in the tls module:
-
http://kamailio.org/docs/modules/stable/modules/tls.html#tls_disable_compression
But you can try with it set and see what happens.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 1/24/13 10:09 AM, Peter Dunkley wrote:
> I shod also add that the Kamailio WebSocket implementation does not
> support any extensions. So unless the deflate frame extension is
> implicit for TLS it will not be negotiated. Further, the
> implementation does not set any compressed bits and all unused flags
> etc should be zeroed automatically - but I will look at the code later.
>
> Peter
>
> On 24 Jan 2013, at 09:05, Peter Dunkley
> <peter.dunkley at crocodile-rcs.com
> <mailto:peter.dunkley at crocodile-rcs.com>> wrote:
>
>> I am not sure how to investigate this. It sounds like it might be a
>> TLS related problem (or a WebSocket/TLS interworking problem in
>> Kamailio). I don't know anything about the Kamailio TLS
>> implementation - I just drop WebSocket frames into it as required.
>>
>> I did do (a little) WSS testing and saw no problems myself.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Peter
>>
>> On 23 Jan 2013, at 22:12, Pete Kelly <pkelly at gmail.com
>> <mailto:pkelly at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi, I am having an issue at the moment with SIP NOTIFY messages
>>> being sent from Kamailio (latest git master) over wss transport
>>>
>>> I am getting reports from the receiving end saying "Compressed bit
>>> must be 0 if no negotiated deflate-frame extension"
>>>
>>> The only reference I can find to it is at the following URL... where
>>> the problem was caused by the server miscalculating the size of the
>>> msg:
>>> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/12308728/compressed-bit-must-be-0-when-sending-a-message-to-websocket-client
>>>
>>> Does anyone have any suggestions as to how I could debug this within
>>> Kamailio? It sounds like Kamailio may be sending some incorrect
>>> packet information but I am unsure at this point.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
>>> sr-users at lists.sip-router.org <mailto:sr-users at lists.sip-router.org>
>>> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>> _______________________________________________
>> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
>> sr-users at lists.sip-router.org <mailto:sr-users at lists.sip-router.org>
>> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
> sr-users at lists.sip-router.org
> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla - http://www.asipto.com
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio World Conference, April 16-17, 2013, Berlin
- http://conference.kamailio.com -
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20130124/342651be/attachment-0001.htm>
More information about the sr-users
mailing list