[SR-Users] Missing Route headers in locally generated BYE

[Daniel-Constantin Mierla]

Hello,

can you share the database record or kamctl mi dlg_list for such call? 
It helps to see if record route values are stored properly in first place.

Cheers,
Daniel

On 05/12/13 14:47, Efelin Novak wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I locally generate BYE using dlg_end_dlg. When I want to end a call 
> that is "transport layer" bridged, the BYE is not sent to first hop in 
> route_set but directly to the endpoint. In such BYE there are no Route 
> headers. In non-bridging calls Routes are correctly placed and the 
> message is routed to the first "hop".
>
> When the error happens, this is written to a log:
>
> WARNING: rr [loose.c:821]: after_loose(): no socket found for match 
> second RR
>
> Here ([SR-Users] no socket found for match second RR) I have read this 
> is only a warning, but in my configuration it seriously influences the 
> message routing.
>
> My setup is
>
> phone1(192.168.10.3) <--TCP--> kamailio1(192.168.10.2) <--UDP--> 
> kamailio2(192.168.5.3) <--UDP--> phone2
>
> On kamailio1 I generate dlg_end_dlg and the BYE is sent to phone1 and 
> phone2 directly.
>
> I'm using Kamailio 4.0.4 on Debian machines.
>
> How can I make the Kamailio1 to send the BYE to kamailio2 in the 
> transport layer bridging scenario? Do I have some misconfiguration or 
> this is not a correct behaviour?
>
> Thanks for answer
>
> Efelin
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
> sr-users at lists.sip-router.org
> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users

-- 
Daniel-Constantin Mierla - http://www.asipto.com
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20131211/59ec03a2/attachment.html>