[SR-Users] MTREE reload question
Uri Shacked
ushacked at gmail.com
Tue Sep 11 10:55:16 CEST 2012
Hi,
The number of shmem:fragments reduced by half and the real_used_size is
lower as well.
Thanks
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 11:12 AM, Uri Shacked <ushacked at gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks.
> Will it ork on pkg as well?
>
> On 9/11/12, Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > On 9/10/12 2:27 PM, Uri Shacked wrote:
> >> thanks a lot.
> >> so as i undestand, the real_used_size is the right value to calculate
> >> size. but, it grows because of fragmentation data.
> >> in the core, what does it mean "It is effective if MEM_JOIN_FREE
> >> compile option is defined"
> >> is there something else i need to do except adding to the cfg the
> >> mem_join=1 ?
> > no, iirc MEM_JOIN_FREE is enabled by default -- this is an option to
> > turn the feature off at compile time. Let us know if the number of
> > fragments is lower.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Daniel
> >
> >>
> >> On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 2:39 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla
> >> <miconda at gmail.com <mailto:miconda at gmail.com>> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >>
> >> On 9/10/12 1:14 PM, Uri Shacked wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>>
> >>> The stuff i sent is from my test server that has 3.3.1 installed.
> >>>
> >>> On my prod servers i use 3.2.x.
> >>>
> >>> how would you explain that when kamailio starts (on prod with
> >>> similar data and same cfg) it take around 20% of the shmem, after
> >>> reload 30% and in time (6-8 weeks) it gets up to 39% ?
> >>>
> >>
> >> if used_size does not have variations, then it is no leak. The
> >> variations of real_used_size is from fragmentation management --
> >> each fragment has a structure associated to it.
> >>
> >> Cheers,
> >> Daniel
> >>
> >>
> >>> I start with 4G of shmem.
> >>>
> >>> It feels like a leak but i have trouble investigating it....
> >>> where would you look? The reload, the dialog or the avp's?
> >>>
> >>> BR,
> >>>
> >>> Uri
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 11:06 AM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla
> >>> <miconda at gmail.com <mailto:miconda at gmail.com>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Hello,
> >>>
> >>> the used size is pretty much the same after the reload, so
> >>> doesn't look as leak. If you do 2-3 reloads is
> >>> shmem:used_size staying around same value?
> >>>
> >>> It is clear boost in the fragments, I would say that after
> >>> start the number of fragments is quite low, because it should
> >>> contain the good records in memory as well.
> >>>
> >>> Btw, the version 3.3.x has options for defragmentation, see
> >>> the core cookbook, you can enable it.
> >>>
> >>> Cheers,
> >>> Daniel
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On 9/9/12 10:18 AM, Uri Shacked wrote:
> >>>> Hi,
> >>>> here is the statistics after kamailio starts:
> >>>> shmem:fragments = 28
> >>>> shmem:free_size = 3800871312
> >>>> shmem:max_used_size = 494132368
> >>>> shmem:real_used_size = 494095984
> >>>> shmem:total_size = 4294967296
> >>>> shmem:used_size = 342642072
> >>>> here it is after reload of the num table:
> >>>> shmem:fragments = 9161531
> >>>> shmem:free_size = 3654274496
> >>>> shmem:max_used_size = 959885552
> >>>> shmem:real_used_size = 640692800
> >>>> shmem:total_size = 4294967296
> >>>> shmem:used_size = 342654552
> >>>> here is the cfg part for mtree:
> >>>> #------- mtree params -------------
> >>>> modparam("mtree", "db_url", CFGDB)
> >>>> modparam("mtree", "mtree",
> >>>> "name=odr;dbtable=service_odr_view;type=0;")
> >>>> modparam("mtree", "mtree",
> >>>> "name=oper;dbtable=service_oper_type;type=0;")
> >>>> modparam("mtree", "mtree",
> >>>> "name=permis;dbtable=service_permisions_to_oper;type=0;")
> >>>> modparam("mtree", "mtree",
> >>>> "name=num;dbtable=service_numbers_to_areas_view;type=0;")
> >>>> modparam("mtree", "char_list", "0123456789")
> >>>> modparam("mtree", "pv_value", "$avp(mtval)")
> >>>> modparam("mtree", "pv_values", "$avp(mtvals)")
> >>>> here is the number of raws from the DB:
> >>>> SELECT count(*) FROM
> >>>> `service`.`service_numbers_to_areas_view` = 4195528
> >>>> and attached is the memory log.
> >>>> thanks,
> >>>> Uri
> >>>>
> >>>> On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 10:26 AM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla
> >>>> <miconda at gmail.com <mailto:miconda at gmail.com>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> Hello,
> >>>>
> >>>> is this taken only after startup? Get one at startup and
> >>>> another one after reload, so it can be compared.
> >>>>
> >>>> Cheers,
> >>>> Daniel
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On 9/6/12 9:22 AM, Uri Shacked wrote:
> >>>>> Hi,
> >>>>> here:
> >>>>> shmem:fragments = 143898
> >>>>> shmem:freesize = 3446570952
> >>>>> shmem:max_used_size = 861854768
> >>>>> shmem:real_used_size = 848396344
> >>>>> shmem:total_size = 4294967296
> >>>>> shmem:used_size = 319676976
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 9:49 AM, Daniel-Constantin
> >>>>> Mierla <miconda at gmail.com <mailto:miconda at gmail.com>>
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Hello,
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On 9/5/12 3:06 PM, Uri Shacked wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Hi,
> >>>>> I use MTREE to load 5 million rows from the
> >>>>> database. it takes about 30 sec to start
> >>>>> kamailio and it is running great.
> >>>>> Whern I check the shmem usage I see the data
> >>>>> take about 0.8G out of 4G i set on shmem.
> >>>>> When i reload the data while kamailio is
> >>>>> running, the memory usage rises to 1.3G and
> >>>>> stays there (the second and next reloads stays
> >>>>> on 1.3G as well).
> >>>>> Why doesn't it return to 0.8G after the reload
> >>>>> is completed?
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> can you send the statistics related to shmem?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> kamctl fifo get_statistics shmem:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> There are different values there, some usage come
> >>>>> from overhead of memory chunks management.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Cheers,
> >>>>> Daniel
> >>>>>
> >>>>> --
> >>>>> Daniel-Constantin Mierla - http://www.asipto.com
> >>>>> http://twitter.com/#!/miconda
> >>>>> <http://twitter.com/#%21/miconda> -
> >>>>> http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
> >>>>> Kamailio Advanced Training, Berlin, Nov 5-8, 2012 -
> >>>>> http://asipto.com/u/kat
> >>>>> Kamailio Advanced Training, Miami, USA, Nov 12-14,
> >>>>> 2012 - http://asipto.com/u/katu
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>> Daniel-Constantin Mierla -http://www.asipto.com
> >>>> http://twitter.com/#!/miconda
> >>>> <http://twitter.com/#%21/miconda> -
> http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
> >>>> Kamailio Advanced Training, Berlin, Nov 5-8, 2012
> >>>> -http://asipto.com/u/kat
> >>>> Kamailio Advanced Training, Miami, USA, Nov 12-14, 2012
> >>>> -http://asipto.com/u/katu
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Daniel-Constantin Mierla -http://www.asipto.com
> >>> http://twitter.com/#!/miconda <
> http://twitter.com/#%21/miconda>
> >>> -http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
> >>> Kamailio Advanced Training, Berlin, Nov 5-8, 2012
> >>> -http://asipto.com/u/kat
> >>> Kamailio Advanced Training, Miami, USA, Nov 12-14, 2012
> >>> -http://asipto.com/u/katu
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Daniel-Constantin Mierla -http://www.asipto.com
> >> http://twitter.com/#!/miconda <http://twitter.com/#%21/miconda>
> >> -http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
> >> Kamailio Advanced Training, Berlin, Nov 5-8, 2012
> >> -http://asipto.com/u/kat
> >> Kamailio Advanced Training, Miami, USA, Nov 12-14, 2012
> >> -http://asipto.com/u/katu
> >>
> >>
> >
> > --
> > Daniel-Constantin Mierla - http://www.asipto.com
> > http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
> > Kamailio Advanced Training, Berlin, Nov 5-8, 2012 -
> http://asipto.com/u/kat
> > Kamailio Advanced Training, Miami, USA, Nov 12-14, 2012 -
> > http://asipto.com/u/katu
> >
> >
>
> --
> Sent from my mobile device
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20120911/b5fc9bca/attachment-0001.htm>
More information about the sr-users
mailing list