[SR-Users] event_route[dialog:failed] and Warning "script writer didn't realese transaction"
miconda at gmail.com
Mon Sep 10 09:56:55 CEST 2012
the warning is harmless. I can't say right now what is exact relation
between the dialog event route and it, I will have to look at sources --
dialog module registers some callbacks. But at the end, everything
should go fine.
I would create the dialog only when it is pretty much clear the invite
is relayed, unless you have other purposes for it, makes no much sense
to add the overhead of creating dialog structures just to destroy them
in next lines of the config.
On 9/9/12 2:15 PM, Uri Shacked wrote:
> I started using testing the event_route[dialog:failed].
> On my scenario, I receive an INVITE, use t_newtran(), check some stuff
> and send a failure reply like 3XX or 4XX.
> I use send_reply() and can see that the TM sends the reply.
> Now, if I use event_route[dialog:failed], I keep on getting the
> warning "script writer didn't release transaction".
> IfI delete the event_route[dialog:failed] from the script, the warning
> does not appear.
> My solution was to work stateless, which is OK for this scenario.
> But, still,
> What does this event_route has that shows this warning?
> Why doesn't the transaction being released? (I tried to use t_reply as
> well and still the same).
> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
> sr-users at lists.sip-router.org
Daniel-Constantin Mierla - http://www.asipto.com
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio Advanced Training, Berlin, Nov 5-8, 2012 - http://asipto.com/u/kat
Kamailio Advanced Training, Miami, USA, Nov 12-14, 2012 - http://asipto.com/u/katu
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the sr-users