[SR-Users] rtpproxy module flags 1 and 2 question

[Klaus Darilion]

Please ask Andreas about those flags - he commited it

regards
klaus

On 17.10.2012 20:18, Juha Heinanen wrote:
> Juha Heinanen writes:
>
>> is the setup without the 1/2 flags like this:
>>
>>    uac invite -> proxy -> invite -> proxy -> invite -> first uas
>>                        -> cancel -> proxy -> cancel -> first uas
>> 		      -> invite -> second uas
>> 			
>> where second proxy instance calls unforce_rtpproxy when it receives the
>> cancel, thus tearing down also the rtpproxy session for the second leg?
>>
>> is so, why would second proxy instance be involved with rtpproxy stuff
>> at all because that has been already taken care of by the first
>> instance?
>
> or is it so that first proxy instance didn't arm rtpproxy, but second
> instance did and then first instance armed rtpproxy for second uas
> before second instance unarmed it due to cancel?
>
> -- juha
>