[SR-Users] rtpproxy module flags 1 and 2 question

[Juha Heinanen]

Juha Heinanen writes:

> is the setup without the 1/2 flags like this:
> 
>   uac invite -> proxy -> invite -> proxy -> invite -> first uas
>                       -> cancel -> proxy -> cancel -> first uas
> 		      -> invite -> second uas
> 			
> where second proxy instance calls unforce_rtpproxy when it receives the
> cancel, thus tearing down also the rtpproxy session for the second leg?
> 
> is so, why would second proxy instance be involved with rtpproxy stuff
> at all because that has been already taken care of by the first
> instance?

or is it so that first proxy instance didn't arm rtpproxy, but second
instance did and then first instance armed rtpproxy for second uas
before second instance unarmed it due to cancel?

-- juha