[SR-Users] rtpproxy module flags 1 and 2 question

[Ovidiu Sas]

That's a very unclear/ambiguous description for those flags ...

-ovidiu

On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 1:10 PM, Klaus Darilion
<klaus.mailinglists at pernau.at> wrote:
> Hi Juha!
>
> Maybe the description is bad/wrong, but the details are described in this
> thread:
>
> http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-users/2012-February/071943.html
>
> regards
> Klaus
>
>
> On 17.10.2012 18:47, Juha Heinanen wrote:
>>
>> i'm new to rtpproxy (have been using mediaproxy for years) and now try
>> to understand if it would make sense to switch over.  rtpproxy readme
>> has this on flags value 1:
>>
>>    + 1 - append first Via branch to Call-ID when sending command to
>>          rtpproxy.
>>          ...
>>         This is especially useful if you have serially forked call
>>          scenarios where rtpproxy gets an "update" command for a new
>>          branch, and then a "delete" command for the previous branch,
>>          which would otherwise delete the full call, breaking the
>>          subsequent "lookup" for the new branch.
>>
>> how it would be possible in SERIAL forked scenario to get anything for a
>> new branch before previous branch has first failed and gone?
>>
>> -- juha