[SR-Users] rtpproxy module flags 1 and 2 question

[Klaus Darilion]

Hi Juha!

Maybe the description is bad/wrong, but the details are described in 
this thread:

http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-users/2012-February/071943.html

regards
Klaus

On 17.10.2012 18:47, Juha Heinanen wrote:
> i'm new to rtpproxy (have been using mediaproxy for years) and now try
> to understand if it would make sense to switch over.  rtpproxy readme
> has this on flags value 1:
>
>    + 1 - append first Via branch to Call-ID when sending command to
>          rtpproxy.
>          ...
> 	This is especially useful if you have serially forked call
>          scenarios where rtpproxy gets an "update" command for a new
>          branch, and then a "delete" command for the previous branch,
>          which would otherwise delete the full call, breaking the
>          subsequent "lookup" for the new branch.
>
> how it would be possible in SERIAL forked scenario to get anything for a
> new branch before previous branch has first failed and gone?
>
> -- juha
>
> _______________________________________________
> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
> sr-users at lists.sip-router.org
> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>