[SR-Users] FS#213 - pua_reginfo: registration state may be incorrect when unregistering single contact
Gnaneshwar Gatla
GGatla at InTouchHealth.com
Sat Jun 2 00:02:41 CEST 2012
I'm working with pua_reginfo module, I thought everything was working fine.
But FS#213, is not resolved yet.
@@ -118,9 +111,10 @@ str* build_reginfo_full(urecord_t * record, str uri, ucontact_t* c, int type) {
xmlNewProp(contact_node, BAD_CAST "id", BAD_CAST buf);
/* Check, if this is the modified contact: */
if (ptr == c) {
- if ((type & UL_CONTACT_INSERT) || (type & UL_CONTACT_UPDATE))
+ if ((type & UL_CONTACT_INSERT) || (type & UL_CONTACT_UPDATE)) {
+ reg_active = 1;
xmlNewProp(contact_node, BAD_CAST "state", BAD_CAST "active");
- else
+ } else
xmlNewProp(contact_node, BAD_CAST "state", BAD_CAST "terminated");
if (type & UL_CONTACT_INSERT) xmlNewProp(contact_node, BAD_CAST "event", BAD_CAST "created");
else if (type & UL_CONTACT_UPDATE) xmlNewProp(contact_node, BAD_CAST "event", BAD_CAST "refreshed");
from the above code in pua_reginfo_fix_registration_state.patch
If(ptr == c) returns false and the server keeps the state to "active" and the reg_info is never set to refreshed/terminated.
I was wondering if I could use the following instead.
If(strcmp(ptr->c, c->c)), which would compare the contact string, if equal the reg_info is update in the presentity.
Regards
Gnaneshwar Gatla | InTouch Health | Software Developer
6330 Hollister Ave. Goleta CA, 93117 | P: 805.562.8686 ext: 199
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20120601/f287bd34/attachment.htm>
More information about the sr-users
mailing list