[SR-Users] rtpproxy VS Turn
Klaus Darilion
klaus.mailinglists at pernau.at
Mon Sep 19 09:38:15 CEST 2011
Am 16.09.2011 16:54, schrieb Mikael Williams:
> ICE is not supported as I select the Media Proxy (which is TURN)
> manually in some Nat cases...Even note that I do not have peer to
> peer calls between 2 endpoints, just have VOIP to PSTN calls...All
> my VOIP customers supports STUN/TURN but without ICE
STUN or TURN?
> One more thing: I would like to ask how rtp proxy help to bypass NAT
> else than working as relay server...Does it have any other job like
> find the NAT type or check blocked port or something?
"rtpproxy" is just an RTP relay (actually it is an UDP relay) - nothing
more. It is controlled by the rtpproxy module of Kamailio.
regards
Klaus
>
> Regards
>
>
> On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 5:50 PM, Klaus Darilion
> <klaus.mailinglists at pernau.at <mailto:klaus.mailinglists at pernau.at>>
> wrote:
>
> STUN alone is not 100% sufficient, only ICE+TURN is reliable.
> Thus, only if all your clients support ICE+TURN then you can
> drop rtpproxy.
>
> klaus
>
>
> On 16.09.2011 16:47, Mikael Williams wrote:
>
> Dear All,
>
> I would like to ask please if and in case I'm using
> STUN/TURN for Nat
> traversal to drp the rtpproxy from my solution as NAT
> traversal and
> relay server as I'm using SYUN for NAT traversal and TURN as
> relay in
> case of Symmetric NAT
>
> Regards
>
>
> _________________________________________________
> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users
> mailing list
> sr-users at lists.sip-router.org
> <mailto:sr-users at lists.sip-router.org>
> http://lists.sip-router.org/__cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-__users
> <http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
> sr-users at lists.sip-router.org
> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
More information about the sr-users
mailing list