[SR-Users] rtpproxy VS Turn

[Mikael Williams]

>
> ICE is not supported as I select the Media Proxy (which is TURN) manually
> in some Nat cases...Even note that I do not have peer to peer calls between
> 2 endpoints, just have VOIP to PSTN calls...All my VOIP customers supports
> STUN/TURN but without ICE
>
> One more thing: I would like to ask how rtp proxy help to bypass NAT else
> than working as relay server...Does it have any other job like find the NAT
> type or check blocked port or something?
>
> Regards
>
>
> On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 5:50 PM, Klaus Darilion <
> klaus.mailinglists at pernau.at> wrote:
>
>> STUN alone is not 100% sufficient, only ICE+TURN is reliable. Thus, only
>> if all your clients support ICE+TURN then you can drop rtpproxy.
>>
>> klaus
>>
>>
>> On 16.09.2011 16:47, Mikael Williams wrote:
>>
>>> Dear All,
>>>
>>> I would like to ask please if and in case I'm using STUN/TURN for Nat
>>> traversal to drp the rtpproxy from my solution as NAT traversal and
>>> relay server as I'm using SYUN for NAT traversal and TURN as relay in
>>> case of Symmetric NAT
>>>
>>> Regards
>>>
>>>
>>> ______________________________**_________________
>>> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
>>> sr-users at lists.sip-router.org
>>> http://lists.sip-router.org/**cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-**users<http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users>
>>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20110916/c510c45a/attachment.htm>