[SR-Users] Dispatcher Confusion (v3.2.0)

Asgaroth 00asgaroth00 at gmail.com
Wed Oct 26 19:24:07 CEST 2011


On 26/10/2011 10:47, Asgaroth wrote:
>
> Assuming ds_probing_mode = 0 (Only send "ping" requests when
> destination is in probing state)
>
> IX (Inactive)
>     [*] Not used by ds_select_* in gateway selection
>     [*] No ping probes sent to destination
> IP (Inactive-Probing)
>     [*] Not used by ds_select_* in gateway selection
>     [*] Ping probes sent to destination
>     [*] When reply to ping probe is recieved, state for gateway chages
> to AX (Active)

Testing with dev branch, the above assumption is true, however, I am
having the following issues:

[1] When using ds_mark_dst() in routing script, when timeout occurs, the
destination is marked as inactive (state: IX), this appears to be the
correct operation for this command.
[2] When using ds_mark_dst("ip") in routing script, when timeout ocurs,
the destination is marked as inactive (state: IX), this does *not*
appear to work properly, state should be IP
[3] When using:
            ds_mark_dst("i");
            ds_mark_dst("p");
     In the routing script, the state changes to "IX" when
ds_mark_dst("i") is executed, which is correct, then, right after that,
when ds_mark_dst("p") is executed, the state is changed to AP
(active-probing).

Therefor, with the above testing, I am unable to set the state to
inactive-probing from within the routing script.

Kamailio version for the above tests is:

# sbin/kamailio -V
version: kamailio 3.3.0-dev0 (i386/linux) 25bedc
flags: STATS: Off, USE_IPV6, USE_TCP, USE_TLS, TLS_HOOKS, USE_RAW_SOCKS,
DISABLE_NAGLE, USE_MCAST, DNS_IP_HACK, SHM_MEM, SHM_MMAP, PKG_MALLOC,
DBG_QM_MALLOC, USE_FUTEX, FAST_LOCK-ADAPTIVE_WAIT, USE_DNS_CACHE,
USE_DNS_FAILOVER, USE_NAPTR, USE_DST_BLACKLIST, HAVE_RESOLV_RES
ADAPTIVE_WAIT_LOOPS=1024, MAX_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE 262144, MAX_LISTEN 16,
MAX_URI_SIZE 1024, BUF_SIZE 65535, DEFAULT PKG_SIZE 4MB
poll method support: poll, epoll_lt, epoll_et, sigio_rt, select.
id: 25bedc
compiled on 09:18:41 Oct 21 2011 with gcc 4.1.2
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20111026/0ab8b777/attachment.htm>


More information about the sr-users mailing list