[SR-Users] binary name
Claudio Furrer
elcaio at gmail.com
Wed Mar 23 02:57:58 CET 2011
Hi Sascha,
Thanks your answer..
I'm coming from ser flavour, and need to upgrade to 3.x, then my doubt is
specifically related with ser/sip-router. Now I've already have ser binaries
(ser, sercmd, etc) and am i asking if new binaries should be named as ser* or
siprouter* based on the flavour set.
Moreover, what if it's a new installation and need only common modules and a
few of modules_s.. Then which flavour is recommended (ser or sip-router) and
which name should the main binaries have.
Again, thank you.
Claudio
On Tue, 22 Mar 2011, Sascha Daniels wrote:
> Hi.
>
> If you use FLAVOUR=kamailio you will get kamailio, kamctl and kamdbctl
> as binary.
>
> Regards
> Sascha
>
> Am 22.03.2011 19:42, schrieb Claudio Furrer:
> > Hello,
> >
> > What is (or should be) the binary main name when using FLAVOUR=ser,
> > FLAVOUR=sip-router or no FLAVOUR specified?
> >
> > I'm getting "ser" as the name whatever I set to FLAVOUR var at compile time. Is
> > it right? (Makefiles.defs says "ser" in these cases but not sure the intention
> > of the sip-router project).
> >
> > I need to know the correct one to make an ebuild package for Gentoo.
> > Thank you for your answers..
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> AMOOMA GmbH - Bachstr. 124 - 56566 Neuwied --> http://www.amooma.de
> Geschäftsführer: Stefan Wintermeyer, Handelsregister Montabaur B14998
>
> Bücher: http://das-asterisk-buch.de - http://ruby-auf-schienen.de
>
>
More information about the sr-users
mailing list