[SR-Users] binary name

Claudio Furrer elcaio at gmail.com
Wed Mar 23 02:57:58 CET 2011


Hi Sascha,
Thanks your answer..
I'm coming from ser flavour, and need to upgrade to 3.x, then my doubt is 
specifically related with ser/sip-router. Now I've already have ser binaries 
(ser, sercmd, etc) and am i asking if new binaries should be named as ser* or 
siprouter* based on the flavour set.

Moreover, what if it's a new installation and need only common modules and a 
few of modules_s.. Then which flavour is recommended (ser or sip-router) and 
which name should the main binaries have.

Again, thank you.
Claudio

On Tue, 22 Mar 2011, Sascha Daniels wrote:

> Hi.
> 
> If you use FLAVOUR=kamailio you will get kamailio, kamctl and kamdbctl
> as binary.
> 
> Regards
>                  Sascha
>    
> Am 22.03.2011 19:42, schrieb Claudio Furrer:
> > Hello,
> >
> > What is (or should be) the binary main name when using FLAVOUR=ser, 
> > FLAVOUR=sip-router or no FLAVOUR specified?
> >
> > I'm getting "ser" as the name whatever I set to FLAVOUR var at compile time. Is 
> > it right? (Makefiles.defs says "ser" in these cases but not sure the intention 
> > of the sip-router project).
> >
> > I need to know the correct one to make an ebuild package for Gentoo.
> > Thank you for your answers..
> >
> >   
> 
> 
> -- 
> AMOOMA GmbH - Bachstr. 124 - 56566 Neuwied  -->  http://www.amooma.de
> Geschäftsführer: Stefan Wintermeyer, Handelsregister Montabaur B14998
> 
> Bücher: http://das-asterisk-buch.de - http://ruby-auf-schienen.de
> 
> 


More information about the sr-users mailing list