[SR-Users] Failure Route and Reply Routes

[Brandon Armstead]

Alex,

    Thank you for this information!  This is now making some more sense as
to the results I am seeing.  Thanks again!

Sincerely,
Brandon Armstead

On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 2:13 PM, Alex Balashov <abalashov at evaristesys.com>wrote:

> On 02/17/2011 05:07 PM, Brandon Armstead wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>>    Is there any specific information / documentation as to what kind
>> of response causes the failure_route to trigger over the reply_route.
>>
>> For example, it seems that 486 response triggers the failure route
>> while as a 408 triggers the reply_route.
>>
>> Perhaps I am over looking something?
>>
>> I would imagine that 5xx and 6xx (final / non provisional responses)
>> would trigger the failure route.
>>
>> While as 4xx would trigger the reply route -- however this does not
>> always seem to be the case in the example of 486 vs 408.
>>
>> Any information / help in advance is greatly appreciated, thanks!
>>
>
> >= 300 responses are considered failures and trigger the failure route.
>  They *also* trigger the reply route first.
>
> >= 200 && < 300 replies trigger the reply route only.
>
> Non-100 1xx provisional replies also trigger the reply route.
>
> --
> Alex Balashov - Principal
> Evariste Systems LLC
> 260 Peachtree Street NW
> Suite 2200
> Atlanta, GA 30303
> Tel: +1-678-954-0670
> Fax: +1-404-961-1892
> Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/
>
> _______________________________________________
> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
> sr-users at lists.sip-router.org
> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20110217/e0dd2d47/attachment.htm>