[SR-Users] kamailio 3.0.3 tls problems

[Ovidiu Sas]

Daniel,

What do you think about moving the (k) presence modules to standard
for the next 3.1 kamailio release?


Regards,
Ovidiu Sas

On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 11:38 AM, Andrei Pelinescu-Onciul
<andrei at iptel.org> wrote:
> On Sep 28, 2010 at 11:29, Ovidiu Sas <osas at voipembedded.com> wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 11:10 AM, Andrei Pelinescu-Onciul
>> <andrei at iptel.org> wrote:
>> >
>> > You mean there are no presence modules in the default config (which
>> > right now uses common modules + modules comming from ser).
>> > You can use the presence modules under modules_k (the ones comming from
>> > kamailio), although they might not mix well with the ser-like DB (ser
>> > presence modules are obsolete).
>>
>> If ser presence modules are obsolete, can we move them to the obsolete
>> directory and promote k ones to stadard?
>
> They already under obsolete/, except for presence_b2b.
>
> Moving the k ones to standard should be ok, as soon as someone can check
> that they do not depend on some modules still under modules_k (e.g.
> using an API implemented in one of them) and they are independent from
> the DB tables point of view (they use their own tables or tables that
> are the same both in k and ser).
> Basically if someone introduces them in a ser config, they wouldn't
> cause any problems.
>
>
> Andrei
>