[SR-Users] rtpproxy (k): removal of force_rtpproxy

[Alex Balashov]

On 09/21/2010 11:23 AM, Alex Balashov wrote:

> On 09/21/2010 11:12 AM, Ovidiu Sas wrote:
>> Hello all,
>>
>> I would like to propose the removal of force_rtp_proxy function from
>> the rtpproxy (k) module.
>> Instead, the rtpproxy_offer/rtpproxy_answer should be used.
>>
>> Why?
>> - force_rtp_proxy no longer support 200ok/ACK SDP negotiation ('s'
>> flag was deprecated);
>> - all functionality of force_rtp_proxy is provided by
>> rtpproxy_offer/rtpproxy_answer;
>> - rtpproxy_offer/rtpproxy_answer is easier to use in the config.
>
> My objection is rooted in the fact that last time I had tried to use
> these functions (about 3 months ago), they still simply did not work.
> I had to use force_rtp_proxy() to achieve the desired effect.
>
> I don't remember at the moment, offhand, exactly the respects in which
> they didn't work. But I've complained about it on the sr-users and
> Kamailio-users list a number of times, most notably in October or
> November 2009.
>

See this thread:

http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-users/2009-October/024925.html

-- 
Alex Balashov - Principal
Evariste Systems LLC
1170 Peachtree Street
12th Floor, Suite 1200
Atlanta, GA 30309
Tel: +1-678-954-0670
Fax: +1-404-961-1892
Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/