[SR-Users] Fwd: A Record-Route header field exists in 200 OK

[Iñaki Baz Castillo]

2010/6/22 Alex Balashov <abalashov at evaristesys.com>:
>> If such REGISTER contains a Record-Route it means that a proxy has
>> added it so the registrar (UAS) MUST mirror "Record-Route" in the 200
>> response. This is what RFC 3261 states, why do you think it's wrong??
>
> I would think his objection would be based on the fact that RR is not used
> with REGISTER, but rather Path.

Right, but anyhow if there is a Record-Route in the REGISTER this is
because some proxy before the registrar added it :)

-- 
Iñaki Baz Castillo
<ibc at aliax.net>