[SR-Users] Fwd: A Record-Route header field exists in 200 OK

[Alex Balashov]

On 06/22/2010 04:39 AM, Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote:
> 2010/6/22 Xiaoqiang Hu<xhu at redhat.com>:
>> Hi all,
>> A Record-Route header field exists in 200 OK from openser register server after sending a REGISTER request with a Record-Route header field. The details can be as follows:
>
> If such REGISTER contains a Record-Route it means that a proxy has
> added it so the registrar (UAS) MUST mirror "Record-Route" in the 200
> response. This is what RFC 3261 states, why do you think it's wrong??

I would think his objection would be based on the fact that RR is not 
used with REGISTER, but rather Path.

-- 
Alex Balashov - Principal
Evariste Systems LLC
1170 Peachtree Street
12th Floor, Suite 1200
Atlanta, GA 30309
Tel: +1-678-954-0670
Fax: +1-404-961-1892
Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/