[SR-Users] some issues with database initialization (berkeley/txt)

[Noa Resare]

I've now verified that berkeley db creation works in the 3.1 branch. Good
work!

/noa

On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 7:07 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda at gmail.com
> wrote:

>
>
> On 12/29/10 6:48 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
>
>
>
> On 12/29/10 6:44 PM, Noa Resare wrote:
>
>  On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 11:05 AM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla <
> miconda at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On 12/27/10 2:09 PM, Juha Heinanen wrote:
>>
>>> Daniel-Constantin Mierla writes:
>>>
>>>  Juha, can the files for former lcr module tables 'gw' and 'lcr' be
>>>> removed?
>>>>
>>> yes, in 3.1 lcr module uses these three tables: lcr_gw, lcr_rule,
>>> lcr_rule_target.
>>>
>>>   ok, done, cherry-picked in 3.1 for dbtext and db_berkeley.
>>
>>
>  Great. I tried building .debs from the 3.1 branch (last commit 553190) and
> indeed it reinits the database of DBTEXT type correctly. Not for db_berkeley
> though.
>
>  thanks for trying and reporting. db_berkely wasn't fixed indeed, I will
> do it in moments.
>
> actually I backported for db_berkeley as well -- first time I thought i
> didn't do it.
>
> However, the fix for db_berkely was done one day later than for dbtext, the
> commit hash 8442fb34 -- take again the latest version of the branch.
>
>
> Cheers,
> Daniel
>
> --
> Daniel-Constantin Mierla
> Kamailio (OpenSER) Advanced Training
> Jan 24-26, 2011, Irvine, CA, USAhttp://www.asipto.com
>
>


-- 
Everything is secret.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20101231/4e17f392/attachment.htm>