[SR-Users] [Sems] Solutions to missing BYEs, accounting for them
Juha Heinanen
jh at tutpro.com
Wed Apr 21 12:51:12 CEST 2010
Stefan Sayer writes:
> > perhaps it would be possible in the same way detach rtp component from
> > sems b2bua signaling component. perhaps it even would be possible to
>
> but, is that desirable? isn't it better if one has only one process to
> start/configure/watch?
may it does not matter how load balancing/resilience is achieved, i.e.,
by sip router selecting a combined b2bua+relay or a b2bua selecting a
relay.
> also, I think that implementing the mediaproxy relay part control in
> SEMS is more work than impelementing RTP packet forward (actually, in
> RTP receiver, it only needs to check whether relay is turned on for
> that session, construct an RTP packet from the buffer, and send the
> packet there).
fine with me as long as relaying is done in kernel space
(libnetfilter-conntrack) close to wire speed.
-- juha
More information about the sr-users
mailing list