[SR-Users] [Sems] Solutions to missing BYEs, accounting for them

Juha Heinanen jh at tutpro.com
Wed Apr 21 12:51:12 CEST 2010


Stefan Sayer writes:

 > > perhaps it would be possible in the same way detach rtp component from
 > > sems b2bua signaling component.  perhaps it even would be possible to
 >
 > but, is that desirable? isn't it better if one has only one process to 
 > start/configure/watch?

may it does not matter how load balancing/resilience is achieved, i.e.,
by sip router selecting a combined b2bua+relay or a b2bua selecting a
relay.

 > also, I think that implementing the mediaproxy relay part control in 
 > SEMS is more work than impelementing RTP packet forward (actually, in 
 > RTP receiver, it only needs to check whether relay is turned on for 
 > that session, construct an RTP packet from the buffer, and send the 
 > packet there).

fine with me as long as relaying is done in kernel space
(libnetfilter-conntrack) close to wire speed.

-- juha




More information about the sr-users mailing list