[Kamailio-Users] [Sip-implementors] Secure VoIP
sarvpriya
sarvpriyagupta at gmail.com
Fri Feb 27 12:54:29 CET 2009
Hi Everyone,
After reading the full chain of mails, I who is currently implementing RFC
3263 feels bit confused. I am not facing any major problems implementing it.
Can i request to give me some points which are dicey and I need to take care
of them.
cheers!!!!
sarvpriya
On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 4:22 PM, Olle E. Johansson <oej at edvina.net> wrote:
>
> 26 feb 2009 kl. 18.27 skrev Daniel-Constantin Mierla:
>
> > On 02/26/2009 07:08 PM, Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote:
> >> 2009/2/26 Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda at gmail.com>:
> >>
> >>> However, being out there so many phones without such support, it is
> >>> practically unusable since service providers won't deploy
> >>> different server
> >>> solutions for each group of devices, so they stick to one size
> >>> fits all and
> >>> that is not DNS for now.
> >>>
> >>
> >> Devices don't implement it, so service providers don't implement it,
> >> so devices don't implement it, so... XD
> >>
> > I think the sip server implementations are pretty good here. Besides
> > that, for client interaction it is required only DNS server
> > configuration, nothing in sip server.
> >
> > What I meant is the headache for sip server providers to deploy two
> > different fault tolerant solution:
> > - one based on DNS
> > - one based on shared/virtual IP or load balancer
> >
> > Each of them will require maintenance, man power, etc... Anyway, even
> > with second option, good DNS in phones does not harm.
>
> A problem here is of course the good old NAT issue. Even if the phones
> have
> DNS support, having a NAT in between the phone and a provider's server
> more or less force a provider to use some IP failover solution to be
> able
> to keep the NAT binding.
>
> DNS helps with failover and some load balancing from the client side,
> so it's a good complement.
>
> I have not yet received requests for NAPTR support in Asterisk, even
> though
> with our recent baby steps into the TLS/TCP world, we really do need
> them.
>
> /O
> _______________________________________________
> Sip-implementors mailing list
> Sip-implementors at lists.cs.columbia.edu
> https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
>
--
cheers!!!!
sarvpriya
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20090227/f03ddc38/attachment.htm>
More information about the sr-users
mailing list