[Kamailio-Users] [Kamailio-Devel] FOSDEM2009 - first remarks/photos

Daniel-Constantin Mierla miconda at gmail.com
Tue Feb 10 15:58:59 CET 2009


On 02/10/2009 04:44 PM, Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote:
> 2009/2/10 Johansson Olle E <oej at edvina.net>:
>   
>>> I have been to XMPP interop, although they focused on Voice/Jingle, I
>>> tried the new purple module -- still some  things to sort out and I will
>>> post a resume about this particular case and entire event.
>>>       
>> I spent monday on the XMPP dev meeting a got a few ideas for improvements.
>>     
>
> Nooo, forget XMPP!!
> SIP SIMPLE already has enough cool specifications, the problem is that
> nobody implements them!
>   
:-) -- maybe SIP extension writers can learn from xmpp where they go 
first for prototype implementation and then to standardization.

You are right, there are cool specification, but many do not map 
properly to reality.


> Looking for interoperability with XMPP will not help, and I don't want
> a future in which my softphone implements SIP for voice and XMPP for
> presence/IM, that's a dirty workaround!
>   
I think a competing open protocol is good all the time, makes things 
improve in both sides. Apart of that, sip and xmpp does not really 
match, SIP is more a routing-like protocol, while xmpp is a content-like 
protocol. XMPP network exist and cannot be ignored.

A good usability of xmpp protocol will be communication between various 
points of your environment, sip servers, web servers, etc...

Cheers,
Daniel

-- 
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
http://www.asipto.com





More information about the sr-users mailing list