[SR-Users] nat_uac_test mode parameter 16
Klaus Darilion
klaus.mailinglists at pernau.at
Wed Aug 5 15:37:25 CEST 2009
The problem arises because the Cisco is SIP asymmetric. Thus, why do you
apply NAT traversal at all?
I would make something like this:
route{
if (src_ip==ip.of.cisco.gw) {
xlog("request from cisco, no NAT traversal");
} else {
force_rport();
if (is_method("REGISTER)) {
fix_nated_register();
} else {
fix_nated_contact();
}
}
...
}
reply_route[x] {
if (src_ip==ip.of.cisco.gw) {
xlog("request from cisco, no NAT traversal");
} else {
fix_nated_contact();
}
...
}
regards
klaus
Andrew O. Zhukov schrieb:
>
>> So:
>>
>> if(is_method("PRACK|ACK") && !is_present_hf("Contact"))
>> append_hf("Contact: <sip:$si:$sp;nat=yes>\r\n");
>>
>> Let me know if works.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Daniel
>
>
> I try it. Do not working.
> http://www.ipshka.com/core/fix_ask.txt
> Snom use the port from INVITE, mesage not from ASK
> Possible it can fix the trouble for other UA. Anyway it's not a common
> solution.
>
>
> Actually, if Cisco is over the port restricted or symmetric nat, without
> the port mapping it's not possible to fix it at all.
>
> Thanks Andrew.
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> sr-users mailing list
> sr-users at lists.sip-router.org
> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
More information about the sr-users
mailing list