[Kamailio-Users] Question about route[4] for NAT

[Daniel-Constantin Mierla]

On 04/11/2009 01:20 AM, x-kamailio at sidell.org wrote:
> Sorry for the potentially stupid question...
>
> I'm trying to make sense of the standard kamailio.cfg file.  At the
> top, it says to remove the #n# comments to enable nat processing.
> Looking down in the code, I see that one of the sections to be enabled
> is route[4].  But, no where else in the file do I see that route(4) is
> ever called.
>
> Is the cfg file missing something, or is route(4) called in some way
> that is not apparent from reading the file?
>   
You are right, calling of route 4 was missing. It should have been in 
the main route. I committed the fix on svn, please update from there.

Thanks,
Daniel

-- 
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
http://www.asipto.com/