[Kamailio-Users] carrier route vs LCR

[Carlos A. Alvarez]

Yes update the cr README....  That we be just peachie!!!  ;^)

-----Original Message-----
From: users-bounces at lists.kamailio.org [mailto:users-bounces at lists.kamailio.org] On Behalf Of Henning Westerholt
Sent: Tuesday, April 14, 2009 4:59 AM
To: users at lists.kamailio.org
Subject: Re: [Kamailio-Users] carrier route vs LCR

On Friday 10 April 2009, Juha Heinanen wrote:
>  > I have been looking at the carrier route and LCR. it appears to me that
>  > LCR can be used to handle tariff , i.e,
>  > selecting lowest cost route. while carrier route doesn't have this
>  > capability at all. but carrier route , according to LCR, scales better
>  > than LCR.
>
> what you mean by "according to LCR"?  i'm not familiar with carrier
> route, but i don't see any other scaling limits with LCR except memory
> for lcr and gw entries.
>
> perhaps carrier route does not keep its corresponding entries in memory,
> but fetches them each time from database?

Hi Juha,

no, it also keeps the entries in the memory, it don't do any run-time DB 
operations for normal routing. Perhaps the original poster referred to the 
pre 1.5.0 state, before your refactoring of the LCR code base. I'll see if i 
can update the cr README a bit.

Cheers,

Henning

_______________________________________________
Kamailio (OpenSER) - Users mailing list
Users at lists.kamailio.org
http://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
http://lists.openser-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users

No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com 
Version: 8.5.287 / Virus Database: 270.11.54/2056 - Release Date: 04/13/09 17:56:00