[OpenSER-Users] Openser 1.3.2 rev_dns=no

[Daniel-Constantin Mierla]

Hello,

please try the attached patch (is for devel but should apply on 1.3.2, 
if no, let me know and I send you another). Similar issue was reported 
to me some time ago, started to investigate but at some point I forgot 
about. I think you face the same case: somewhere in the script you do an 
IP comparison (by src_ip or so) and you have the IP address in between 
quotes. The patch fixed the reverse dns in this case if rev_dns=no. I 
will look more into it to find a better solution -- detecting if the 
value is an IP address and avoid DNS lookup, a.s.o, for IP comparisons.

Let me know the results.

Cheers,
Daniel


On 05/18/08 22:12, Michael Young wrote:
> Here is why I ask:
>
> [root at proxy2 openser]# netstat -su
> Udp:
>     159293 packets received
>     2016 packets to unknown port received.
>     153899 packet receive errors
>     185342 packets sent
>
> On my proxies, as traffic levels increase, I start getting udp errors, which
> I think is pretty much a udp buffer overflow. Once it overflows, that proxy
> is toast until traffic levels die down. I have a pretty basic config, but I
> can't seem to handle more than 4 or 5 new calls per second. I would expect
> to be able to do a lot more than that. So I was trying to make sure that no
> unnecessary udp traffic was going in or out.
>
> The server has two Dual Core Opteron processors, 4 Gb of RAM, running CentOS
> 5 x86_64.
>
> Any suggestions are appreciated... and I'll happily pay for consulting if
> someone wants to look into it.
>
> Michael
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: users-bounces at lists.openser.org
> [mailto:users-bounces at lists.openser.org] On Behalf Of Michael Young
> Sent: Friday, May 16, 2008 9:20 PM
> To: users at lists.openser.org
> Subject: [OpenSER-Users] Openser 1.3.2 rev_dns=no
>
> In my openser.cfg (running 1.3.2), I have:
>
> dns=no
> rev_dns=no
>
> but a packet capture shows OpenSER doing a reverse DNS lookup on my
> provider's proxy IP address with every invite. Are those lines no longer
> supported? I tried starting OpenSER with -R, but same behavior.
>
> Michael Young
>
>
> No virus found in this outgoing message.
> Checked by AVG. 
> Version: 7.5.524 / Virus Database: 269.23.16/1446 - Release Date: 5/16/2008
> 7:42 AM
>  
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users at lists.openser.org
> http://lists.openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG. 
> Version: 7.5.524 / Virus Database: 269.23.16/1446 - Release Date: 5/16/2008
> 7:42 AM
>  
>
> No virus found in this outgoing message.
> Checked by AVG. 
> Version: 7.5.524 / Virus Database: 269.23.20/1453 - Release Date: 5/18/2008
> 9:31 AM
>  
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users at lists.openser.org
> http://lists.openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>   

-- 
http://www.asipto.com

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: route-rev_dns.patch
Type: text/x-diff
Size: 1265 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20080519/10a4e6ab/attachment.patch>