[Serusers] [Sems] Poll on dropping unix socket interface ("unixsockctrl")

[Srinivas Kotamarti]

Hi Raphael,
What are the advantages of binrpcctrl and sipctrl over the unixsockctrl?

Has enough testing done on them? We are currently using SEMS with SER0.9.6 (with unixsockctrl) and it is working OK for us. IF we move to the binrpcctrl or sipctrl would we get a better performance?

Thanks

--Srinivas

-----Original Message-----
From: sems-bounces at lists.iptel.org [mailto:sems-bounces at lists.iptel.org] On Behalf Of Raphael Coeffic
Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2008 7:00 AM
To: sems at lists.iptel.org
Cc: serusers at lists.iptel.org
Subject: [Sems] Poll on dropping unix socket interface ("unixsockctrl")


Hi *!

with the emergence of the binary RPC interface for SER2 ("binrcpctrl"
plug-in), and SEMS' own sip stack ("sipctrl" plug-in), Stefan and I believe
that the unix socket control interface is defeated.

That's why we would like to know who is in favor of dropping support for the
unix socket interface.

Cheers and happy polling!

Stefan & Raphael.
_______________________________________________
Sems mailing list
Sems at lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/sems