[OpenSER-Users] "noisy_ctimer" parameter in TM module
Ovidiu Sas
osas at voipembedded.com
Tue Mar 4 16:21:10 CET 2008
On Tue, Mar 4, 2008 at 5:20 AM, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
<bogdan at voice-system.ro> wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> Thanks a lot for the valuable input. In my opinion,trying to summarize
> the discussion:
>
> what we need is not to have a mechanism to ignore the C timer, but
> rather a better way to manage/control C timer.
>
> This means:
>
> 1) dropping (after all) the "noisy_ctimer" as it proves to be more or
> less a hack
I'm all for it.
> 2) add new feature to manage/control C timer (like onreply route change
> support, different routes for timeout and failures, etc)..
I would like to leave onreply route as is and deal with timeouts in a
timeout_route.
It will keep things structured and organized. If I need to check
something about a timer, it will be in a single place, not spread
around my config (just my 2c).
> Is this commonly agreed?
It looks like.
Regards,
Ovidiu Sas
More information about the sr-users
mailing list